新托福寫(xiě)作中的技巧問(wèn)題我們之前也有整理，但是還是有很多考生掌握不了。今天小編再次為考生整理了一些技巧，另外還增加了一部分內(nèi)容，那就是關(guān)于如何提高托福寫(xiě)作質(zhì)量。希望考生們合理掌握這些技巧!

　　掌握4個(gè)備考技巧為你的托福寫(xiě)作提分

　　通俗易懂的內(nèi)容

　　這點(diǎn)其實(shí)是托福寫(xiě)作中最重要的一點(diǎn)，首先你要保證你文章的內(nèi)容要符合邏輯也要讓人看懂。ETS出托福作文試題時(shí)特別注意選擇一些彈性不是很大的題目，因?yàn)橥懈？荚囎鳛橐环N語(yǔ)言測(cè)試方式，其重點(diǎn)在于測(cè)試考生英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)言水平，考生在構(gòu)思時(shí)只要保證自己的內(nèi)容符合邏輯，能夠言之有理、切題即可，然后把更多的注意力放在如何追求語(yǔ)言的得體性上。在考場(chǎng)上，考生在構(gòu)思內(nèi)容上所花的時(shí)間不應(yīng)超過(guò)5分鐘，在認(rèn)真讀題并將其理解透徹以后，考生可以在試卷題目下方的空白處列一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)短的提綱，以此作為寫(xiě)作過(guò)程中內(nèi)容的提示，在提筆開(kāi)始寫(xiě)作的過(guò)程中就可將重點(diǎn)放在保證語(yǔ)言的流暢得體上，不會(huì)因?yàn)閮?nèi)容而中斷思路。

　　結(jié)構(gòu)清晰的文章

　　這一點(diǎn)是考查了考生的邏輯和語(yǔ)言組織能力。托福高分作文結(jié)構(gòu)模式化，這是最核心的策略。托福作文考題不僅題目彈性小，而且題型相對(duì)穩(wěn)定，這就為考生在短期內(nèi)提高作文分?jǐn)?shù)創(chuàng)造了一個(gè)條件，使考生完全可以在考前針對(duì)考試中可能出現(xiàn)的題型按照固定的結(jié)構(gòu)模式進(jìn)行訓(xùn)練。

　　巧用華麗的語(yǔ)言

　　這一點(diǎn)是對(duì)前兩點(diǎn)的輔助。如果前兩點(diǎn)做的很好，我們可以適當(dāng)再把語(yǔ)言包裝一下，托福高分作文基本收入囊中了。托福明確要求高分作文的句子要做到多樣化，所以最好不要全盤(pán)使用簡(jiǎn)單句，這樣會(huì)降低文章的層次、復(fù)雜句和簡(jiǎn)單句應(yīng)在文章中交叉出現(xiàn)，而對(duì)一些描述性的例證以及臨時(shí)想起的內(nèi)容可以使用簡(jiǎn)單句。

　　準(zhǔn)備充分的前期

　　要想取得新托福寫(xiě)作高分，少不了前期的充分準(zhǔn)備!考前建議考生每個(gè)題型寫(xiě)兩篇文章，對(duì)照范文找差距，不斷修改，不斷完善，這個(gè)過(guò)程不僅會(huì)幫助考生強(qiáng)化固定的結(jié)構(gòu)模式，還可以使他們?cè)谡Z(yǔ)言方面做好準(zhǔn)備。練習(xí)的要點(diǎn)是宜精不宜多，不要走入只寫(xiě)不改、以多求勝的誤區(qū)。另外考生要多研究范文，而不是機(jī)械地背誦范文，研究范文要抓住文章的構(gòu)思、結(jié)構(gòu)、句式、詞匯等方面。

　　小編給出的這四個(gè)方法其實(shí)是很基礎(chǔ)的，但又很實(shí)用。希望各位考生在鍛煉托福寫(xiě)作技巧的同時(shí)，兼顧文章質(zhì)量。不過(guò)，考生也要有信心，因?yàn)橥懈５膶?xiě)作整體難度不是很大，平時(shí)只要多練習(xí)，一定可以在托?？荚囍腥〉煤玫某煽?jī)!

　　細(xì)說(shuō)托福寫(xiě)作不同開(kāi)頭

　　托福寫(xiě)作有很多種開(kāi)頭，下面小編為學(xué)生們介紹如何寫(xiě)出一個(gè)合理的開(kāi)頭。

　　托福綜合寫(xiě)作：開(kāi)頭方法一、比較新穎、有創(chuàng)意的開(kāi)頭

　　“As technologies and the demand for certain services change， many workers will lose their jobs. The responsibility for those people to adjust to such change should belong to the individual worker， not to government or to business.

　　As a saying goes， “God helps those help themselves”， which is true in most cases. But as far as the large numbers of laid-off workers caused by the technological and market changes are concerned， I believe the government and the business certainly have an unshakable responsibility to take.

　　托福綜合寫(xiě)作：開(kāi)頭方法二、 可以適當(dāng)?shù)膹?fù)述一下題目，然后稍作讓步，再表達(dá)自己的觀點(diǎn)和立場(chǎng)

　　“Work greatly influences people’s personal lives—their special interests， their leisure activities， even their appearance way from the work place.”

　　The speaker claims that our jobs greatly influence our personal interests， recreational activities and even appearance. While I agree that the personal lives of some people are largely determined by their work， in my view it would be a mistake to draw this conclusion generally. In my observation， the extent to which occupation influences personal life depends on the nature of the work， and how central the work is to one’s sense of self.

　　“We shape our buildings and afterwards our buildings shape us.”

　　I believe this statement should be interpreted broadly—to mean that we are influenced by the exterior shape of buildings， as well as by the arrangement of multiple buildings and by a building’s various architectural and aesthetic elements. While I doubt that buildings determine our character or basic personality traits， I agree that they can greatly influence our attitudes， moods， and even life styles.

　　托福綜合寫(xiě)作：開(kāi)頭方法三、新托福寫(xiě)作可以以提問(wèn)方式開(kāi)頭，闡述自己的觀點(diǎn)，再表明自己的立場(chǎng)

　　“As technologies and the demand for certain services change， many workers will lose their jobs. The responsibility for those people to adjust to such change should belong to the individual worker， not to government or to business.”

　　As technology and changing social needs render more and more jobs obsolete， who is responsible for helping displaced workers adjustWhile individuals have primary responsibility for learning new skills and finding work， both industry and government have some obligation to provide them the means of doing so.

　　托福綜合寫(xiě)作：開(kāi)頭方法四、可以先表明自己的立場(chǎng)，再闡述原因

　　Businesses are as likely as are governments to establish large bureaucracies， but bureaucracy is far more damaging to a business than it is to a government.

　　Contrary to the statement’s premise， my view is that businesses are less likely than government to establish large bureaucracies， because businesses know that they are more vulnerable than government to damage resulting from bureaucratic inefficiencies. My position is well supported by common sense and by observation.