GRE作文成績從哪兒查?本文就GRE作文成績查詢方法做簡單的介紹，希望可以給大家提供一些參考，預祝大家取得理想的考試成績。

如何查詢GRE作文成績

GRE作文成績從哪兒查?本文主要就網(wǎng)上成績查詢方法做簡單的介紹，希望可以供大家參考。

第一步：進入ETS的GRE頁面http://www.ets.org/gre/;

第二步：點擊右上角“MY GRE ACCOUNT”，注冊新用戶，填寫本人基本信息和考試信息;

第三步：在SERVICES欄中點擊view scores online，就能直接查找到自己的GRE成績了，寫作、語文和數(shù)學都有，還有要寄送成績的學校部系等，很詳細。

GRE寫作滿分范文1

Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region's?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.??Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.??But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?

automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??

The?argument?above?presents?a?sound?case?for?arguing?that?if?the?region?of?Forestville?wants?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?consider?reducing?the?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase?in?speed?limit?took?place?6?months?previously.?However,?there?are?some?intermediate?steps?that?one?could?take?before?jumping?to?the?conclusion?that?reducing?the?speed?limit?is?the?only?way?in?which?traffic?accidents?can?be?reduced.??

First?of?all,?I?would?examine?the?actual?number?of?traffic?accidents?that?occurred?before?and?after?the?speed?limit?increase?and?compare?this?to?the?size?of?the?region?and?its?driving?population.?For?example,?if?the?Forestville?region's?driving?population?is?1?million?people,?and?the?traffic?accidents?for?a?6-month?period?before?the?speed?increase?totaled?100,?then?the?15%?increase?would?amount?to?an?additional?16?traffic?accidents,?or?116?total.?For?a?population?of?1?million,?there?may?be?other?solutions?to?this?increase?besides?reducing?the?speed?limit?to?what?it?was.?(The?comparison?to?the?region?of?Elmsford?would?only?be?helpful?if?the?regions?driving?demography?is?comparable?in?terms?of?size?and?scope.)?A?public?education?campaign?emphasizing?driver?safety?and?safe?driving?techniques?may?suffice?to?reduce?the?number?of?traffic?accidents.?Especially?considering?that?if?the?number?of?accidents?relative?to?the?population?is?somewhat?small,?it?is?a?fairly?safe?driving?population?anyway.??

In?addition,?I?would?consider?lengthening?the?time?of?the?study.?Six?months?may?be?a?relatively?short?period?of?time?for?which?to?study?the?rate?of?traffic?accidents.?Upon?a?closer?examination?of?when?the?accidents?occurred,?one?might?ascertain?that?most?of?the?driving?accidents?occurred?within?a?month?of?raising?the?speed?limit,?but?that?there?have?been?relatively?few?additional?accidents?since?that?first?phase-in?period.?Lengthening?the?study?to?a?one-year?period?would?help?adjust?for?any?untypical?statistics?and?paint?a?more?accurate?picture?of?the?long-term?affects?of?the?speed?limit?increase.??

I?would?also?examine?what?else?was?occurring?in?the?region?during?the?period?of?the?study.?For?example,?was?there?a?major?highway?construction?project?happening?during?this?time?which?would?have?added?to?the?unsafe?nature?of?raod?travel??Are?there?any?alternative?explanations?for?why?the?increase?in?traffic?accidents?could?have?occurred,?or?is?the?increase?in?speed?limit?the?sole?variable??Looking?at?the?type?of?accidents?that?occurred,?I?would?examine?whether?these?are?the?types?of?car?accidents?one?would?expect?from?traveling?at?a?faster?speed?to?corroborate?the?cause?and?effect?relationship.?Comments:?

As?in?the?sample?6?response,?this?writer?sees?some?logic?in?assuming?a?connection?between?the?higher?speed?limit?in?Forestville?and?the?increase?in?auto?accidents.??Unlike?the?sample?6?on?this?topic,?this?response?is?neither?as?exhaustive?in?its?analysis?nor?as?impressively?developed.??The?writer?makes?four?points?in?the?critique:??

--?A?statistical?analysis?might?suggest?that?the?15%?increase?in????accidents?is?not?as?significant?as?it?might?seem.?

--?A?car?safety?education?campaign?might?be?a?better?way?to?solve?the????problem.?

--?A?six?month?period?might?be?too?short?a?time?on?which?to?base?major ???conclusions.?

--?Other?factors?could?have?caused?the?increase?in?accidents.??

Although?each?of?these?points?is?developed?and?sensibly?supported,?the?critique?is?not?sufficiently?full?to?warrant?a?score?of?6.??The?essay?demonstrates?good?control?but?not?mastery?of?the?elements?of?writing:?it?contains?good?variety?in?syntax,?including?effective?use?of?rhetorical?questions.??The?occasional?flaws?(e.g.,?the?somewhat?garbled?syntax?in?paragraph?3:?".time?for?which?to?study?the?rate???")?do?not?detract?from?the?overall?strong?quality?of?the?critique.??For?all?of?these?reasons,?this?response?is?strong?but?not?outstanding,?and?thus?merits?a?score?of?5.

GRE寫作滿分范文2

Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region's?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.??Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.??But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??

At?first?look,?this?seems?to?be?a?very?well?presented?arguement.??A?logical?path?is?followed?throughout?the?paragraph?and?the?conclusion?is?expected.??However,?upon?a?second?consideration,?it?is?apparent?that?all?possibilities?were?not?considered?when?the?author?presented?his?conclusion?(or?at?least?that?s/he?did?not?present?all?of?the?possibilities).?There?are?numerous?potential?explanations?for?why?the?number?of?accidents?in?Elmsford?decreased?while?the?number?in?Forestville?increased.??Although?it?seems?logical?to?assume?that?the?difference?in?the?percentage?of?accidents?was?due?to?the?difference?in?whether?or?not?the?speed?limit?had?been?increased?during?the?specified?month,?this?does?not?necessarily?mean?that?the?speed?limit?should?be?reduced?back?to?what?it?originally?was?in?Forestville.??The?author?does?not?state?two?specific?pieces?of?information?that?are?important?before?a?conclusion?such?as?the?one?the?author?made?is?sound.??The?first?is?that?it?is?not?expressed?whether?the?speed?limits?in?the?two?neighboring?regions?had?had?the?same?speed?limit?before?Forestville's?speed?limit?had?been?increased.??If?they?had?originally?been?the?same,?then?it?is?reasonable?to?conclude?that?Forestville's?speed?limit?should?be?reduced?back?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??However,?if?the?two?region's?speed?limits?were?initially?different,?then?such?a?conclusion?can?not?be?made.??The?second?piece?of?information?that?is?necessary?for?the?present?argument?is?the?relative?number?of?accidents?in?each?of?the?areas?prior?to?the?increase?in?speed?limit.??For?the?author?to?make?the?presented?conclusion,?the?number?of?accidents?should?have?been?approximately?equal?prior?to?the?increase?in?the?speed?limit?in?Forestville.??If?the?two?missing?pieces?of?information?had?been?presented?and?were?in?the?author's?favor,?then?the?conclusion?that?the?author?made?would?have?been?much?more?sound?than?it?currently?is.??In?conclusion,?the?argument?is?not?entirely?well?reasoned,?but?given?the?information?that?was?expressed?in?the?paragraph,?it?was?presented?well,?and?in?a?logical?order.?Comments:?

This?competent?critique?claims?that?there?are?"numerous?potential?explanations?for?why?the?number?of?accidents?in?Elmsford?decreased?while?the?number?in?Forestville?increased."??However,?the?author discusses?only?two?points:??

--?whether?the?speed?limits?in?the?two?regions?were?originally?the?same;????and?

--?the?number?of?accidents?in?each?region?prior?to?Forestville's????raising?the?speed?limit.??

Although?the?response?appears?at?first?to?be?well?developed,?there?is?much?less?analysis?here?than?the?length?would?suggest.??The?first?third?and?last?third?of?the?essay?are?relatively?insubstantial,?consisting?mainly?of?general?summary?statements?(e.g.,?"A?logical?path????conclusion?is?expected"?and?"If?the?two????more?sound?than?it?currently?is").??The?real?heart?of?the?critique?consists?of?minimal?development?of?the?two?points?mentioned?above.??Therefore,?although?two?important?features?of?the?argument?are?analyzed?and?the?writer?handles?language?and?syntax?adequately,?the?lack?of?substantial?development?keeps?this?critique?from?earning?a?score?higher?than?4.

GRE寫作滿分范文3

Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region's?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.??Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.??But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??

This?argument?does?not?have?any?concrete?information.??It?seems?by?Forestville,?increasing?their?speed?limit?more?accidents?occured.??We?all?know?that?accidents?occur?reguardless?of?what?the?speed?limit?of?the?highway?we?travel.??Fortunately,?Elmsford's?accidents?decreased?during?the?six-months?in?discussion.??This?could?be?because?of?good?weather,?careful?drivers,?or?any?number?of?situations.??On?the?other?hand,?Forrestville?had?an?increase?in?accidents.??The?only?determining?factor?given?was?the?speed?limit?increasing.?This?in?fact?probably?did?play?a?big?role?in?why?there?was?a?15%?percent?increase?in?the?accidents,?but?may?not?be?the?only?factor.???In?order?to?make?an?accurate?judgement?on?why?there?was?an?increase?in?automobile?accidents?the?situation??needs?to?be?researched.?Solid?facts?need?to?be?stated.???Clearly,?to?reduce?the?speed?limit?back?to?normal?in?Forrestville?would?not?eliminate?the?problem.?Comments:?

This?limited?critique?is?plainly?flawed.??The?author?begins?with?a?criticism?about?the?lack?of?"concrete?information"?but?then?fails?to?provide?any?concrete?analysis?in?the?response.??The?writer?cites?the?drop?in?Elmsford's?accidents?but?does?not?develop?any?of?the?reasons?mentioned?to?account?for?the?drop:?"good?weather,?careful?drivers,?or?any?number?of?situations."??

The?writer?then?goes?on?to?discuss?Forestville?and?suggests?that?the?speed?limit?"may?not?be?the?only?factor,"?but?this?point?is?not?developed?either.??The?author?issues?a?generic?call?for?more?research?and?facts?and?offers?an?unsupported?conclusion?of?his?or?her?own:?"Clearly,?to?reduce?the?speed?limit?

would?not?eliminate?the?problem."??Although?the?author?appears?to?know?that?there?is?something?wrong?with?the?argument,?he?or?she?does?not?seem?to?know?how?to?critique?the?argument?in?greater?detail.??

The?response?demonstrates?adequate?control?of?the?elements?of?writing,?but?the?analysis?is?so?underdeveloped?that?it?cannot?earn?a?score?higher?than?3.?

如何查詢GRE作文成績相關文章：